Scroll to top

In Sudan’s Forgotten East, Conflict is Likely to Erupt

No comments

In Sudan’s Forgotten East, Conflict is Likely to Erupt

Posted by Annette LaRocco on December 14, 2011

In Sudan’s Forgotten East, Conflict is Likely to Erupt

Malnutrition, extreme poverty, soaring illiteracy, lack of health and education services, and susceptibility to drought and food insecurity are challenges facing the civilian population of a marginalized area of Sudan. The first region which comes to mind is, of course, Darfur, the site of Khartoum’s devastating campaign of displacement and genocide and the focus of much international attention over the past decade. However, these conditions are commonplace throughout much of Sudan’s restive, yet often ignored, eastern region.   

The East garners almost no attention from the international community or media, despite the chronic deprivation of the population, especially the non-Arab Beja. The East’s troubles have been largely overshadowed by the South’s civil war and eventual secession, the conflict in Darfur, and the upsurge in violence along the north-south border. Throughout Sudan, political and economic marginalization has motivated armed resistance movements, and the eastern region is no exception. Evidence suggests that this low-level discontent is ripe to resurface into all-out rebellion again. Recently, an official working with the UN in Kassala described the region as “a volcano waiting to erupt.”

The three states in the East—Red Sea, Kassala, and Gedarif—have low humanitarian indicators despite the presence of many UN agencies. Some of these indicators, like access to clean drinking water and sanitation, are currently lower in the East than they are in Darfur.  Acute malnutrition rates and infant and maternal mortality rates are on par with other equally marginalized, if more publicized, areas of Sudan. Many members of the Beja and Rashaida ethnic groups feel Khartoum has not met its development and infrastructure promises, failing to provide critical services and facilities five years after the government pledged to bring improvements to the eastern states as part of the 2006 peace agreement to end an armed rebellion.

In late October this year, a series of student protests in the eastern city of Kassala voiced grievances regarding the lack of academic resources, rapidly rising food prices, and the oppressive political situation in the country. Hundreds of students took to the streets chanting “people are hungry” and “people want to overthrow the government.”

An anti-government youth group, the Grifina Movement, reported that the Sudanese authorities broke up the student protests with extreme violence, using live ammunition and tear gas as well as running down eight students with a security car.

There are recent reports that Beja fighters are regrouping in the Hamid mountains just across the Eritrean border. A UN source predicts “that conflict on the scale now taking place in South Kordofan and Blue Nile could erupt in Kassala state within a few months.” Both the Beja and Rashaida communities are heavily armed and were never completely disarmed after the 2006 peace deal, a fact which adds to the region’s volatility.

Moreover, Port Sudan is a critical city for Sudan, as it serves as the country’s only seaport.  The city also plays host to essential export and storage facilities and infrastructure associated with the oil sectors of Sudan and South Sudan. Also, the pipelines that transport oil from oilfields north and south of the border to the world market travel through the East. This fact has not been lost on Eastern rebels, with one parliamentarian from Kassala noting, “Eastern Sudan is a strategic area for Khartoum. There is a big airport in Kassala, roads, and the pipelines. You know, the region is big enough to hide in after attacking a pipeline.”

The simmering frustration with Khartoum has led the Beja Congress to join the Sudan Revolutionary Front, an alliance of rebel groups and opposition political parties from around the country. In their statement, the Beja Congress highlighted the common dissatisfaction with the central government among the separate groups, “The ruling regime in Sudan is subjecting its people to humiliation and tyranny. They are arrogant and killing the marginalized people.”

With the unresolved crisis in Darfur, the stalemate in Abyei, two full-blown wars in South Kordofan and Blue Nile, a looming economic collapse in the heretofore privileged capital city, and reports of sporadic fighting along Sudan’s border with South Sudan, there is little space for the international community, already afflicted with “Sudan fatigue,” to turn its attention to the plight of the East. 

But the situation in the East is yet another example of the need to address crises in Sudan holistically, rather than as discrete conflicts. While often put to the side, the simmering conflict in the East is derived from the same set of grievances with the central government in Khartoum as the conflicts in Darfur and the Three Areas. The only way to solve the problems of the East, and the crises in the other marginalized communities of Sudan, is to adopt a comprehensive strategy promoting inclusive constitutional reform and democratic transformation.  

The people of the East have already tried a piecemeal peace process with Khartoum, one which failed to alter center-periphery dynamics in Sudan, just as so many piecemeal peace processes that have gone before it. Maintaining the flawed strategy of individual peace agreements rather than addressing the root causes of the myriad of regional rebellions in Sudan—the exploitative and intransigent government in Khartoum—dooms these discrete agreements to failure. More importantly, this strategy keeps the people of the marginalized areas impoverished, disenfranchised, and desperate.

Photo: A Beja man in the rebel-controlled area of eastern Sudan (IRIN –